<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back on Track: Wolves 2 Fulham 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwolf</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>kwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-996</guid>
		<description>I thought Keogh was one of the poorer players! Seriously. Even for his assist i was yelling at him like a mad man because he took so long to pass it to Edwards. The way he unnecessarily turned back instead of playing it early between the 2 defenders meant that Edwards was nearly covered. Fortunately he made a good pass in the end and Edwards tucked it away. Otherwise i thought his general play was good at times but very poor at others. I was amazed when he inexplicably dribbled the ball over the sideline in front of the Steve Bull stand. He took about 3-4 touches and there was no-one near him. Good players just don&#039;t do this. In general i&#039;ve been thoroughly delighted with the quality of his performances so far this season but surely he&#039;s destined for the bench. If SEB isn&#039;t played i will be livid beyond belief. If Mick was pissed off with some fans wanting Freddy to play ahead of Elliott, Kyle or Keogh, just wait until he picks Keogh ahead of SEB. The fans will turn on him very quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Keogh was one of the poorer players! Seriously. Even for his assist i was yelling at him like a mad man because he took so long to pass it to Edwards. The way he unnecessarily turned back instead of playing it early between the 2 defenders meant that Edwards was nearly covered. Fortunately he made a good pass in the end and Edwards tucked it away. Otherwise i thought his general play was good at times but very poor at others. I was amazed when he inexplicably dribbled the ball over the sideline in front of the Steve Bull stand. He took about 3-4 touches and there was no-one near him. Good players just don&#8217;t do this. In general i&#8217;ve been thoroughly delighted with the quality of his performances so far this season but surely he&#8217;s destined for the bench. If SEB isn&#8217;t played i will be livid beyond belief. If Mick was pissed off with some fans wanting Freddy to play ahead of Elliott, Kyle or Keogh, just wait until he picks Keogh ahead of SEB. The fans will turn on him very quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-995</guid>
		<description>If there&#039;s a genuine reason, fair enough. But one thing is undeniable, Keogh is woeful on the right of midfield. 

The same thing always happens; he gets the ball on the edge of the area but instead of just crossing it or running it into the corner, he turns around, dallies on the ball and eventually loses possession trying to pick out a pass.

I saw it happen in about 10-15 of our 23 home games last season. Hilarious looking back on it, but not so much when you&#039;re hanging on in the dying seconds, trying to run down the clock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s a genuine reason, fair enough. But one thing is undeniable, Keogh is woeful on the right of midfield. </p>
<p>The same thing always happens; he gets the ball on the edge of the area but instead of just crossing it or running it into the corner, he turns around, dallies on the ball and eventually loses possession trying to pick out a pass.</p>
<p>I saw it happen in about 10-15 of our 23 home games last season. Hilarious looking back on it, but not so much when you&#8217;re hanging on in the dying seconds, trying to run down the clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami Al-Jaber</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami Al-Jaber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-994</guid>
		<description>I think the reason for the Kightly-Jarvis substitution, as opposed to it being Kightly for Keogh was to do with Jarvis being knackered, and Keogh still having a bit in the tank. Given how we seemed to be holding on for the last 5, I think it made sense to leave on someone like Keogh with the stamina and enthusiasm to chase everything and, as Jed says, defend from the front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason for the Kightly-Jarvis substitution, as opposed to it being Kightly for Keogh was to do with Jarvis being knackered, and Keogh still having a bit in the tank. Given how we seemed to be holding on for the last 5, I think it made sense to leave on someone like Keogh with the stamina and enthusiasm to chase everything and, as Jed says, defend from the front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Wow, nothing seems to divide opinion like young Andrew Keogh.

I can see both sides of the argument.

He certainly isn&#039;t proficient enough in front of goal and it&#039;s infuriating when he&#039;s presented with a chance and doesn&#039;t even look like scoring.

That being said, I recognise the value he adds by dragging defenders out of position and linking play. He&#039;s a better player away from home, which I think has a lot to do with confidence.

I didn&#039;t think he had a particularly great game against Fulham but he competed well and setup the second goal. It was completely ridiculous that he stayed on when all those subs were being made. Like Jed says, when Kightly came on why would you take a natural wide player off like Jarvis and put Keogh out of position on the right. Strange indeed.

This debate will rage on no doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, nothing seems to divide opinion like young Andrew Keogh.</p>
<p>I can see both sides of the argument.</p>
<p>He certainly isn&#8217;t proficient enough in front of goal and it&#8217;s infuriating when he&#8217;s presented with a chance and doesn&#8217;t even look like scoring.</p>
<p>That being said, I recognise the value he adds by dragging defenders out of position and linking play. He&#8217;s a better player away from home, which I think has a lot to do with confidence.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think he had a particularly great game against Fulham but he competed well and setup the second goal. It was completely ridiculous that he stayed on when all those subs were being made. Like Jed says, when Kightly came on why would you take a natural wide player off like Jarvis and put Keogh out of position on the right. Strange indeed.</p>
<p>This debate will rage on no doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-992</guid>
		<description>@ Emerald Pete I don&#039;t think anyone on this site is a Keogh boo boy, but yes there are some critics, and I happen to be one of them. Yesterday his performance was excellent and he created a goal and defended from the front. I have nothing to criticise him for based on yesterdays performance! Unfortunately on other occasions there have been reasons why he has been criticised, and as a &#039;comment&#039; based blog then everyone is entitled to their point of view - Keogh does not score enough goals full stop! His work rate and enthusiasm is second to none and I applaud him for that. Yesterday puzzled me a little, Keogh played well up front made a goal - Dave Edwards played really well and scored a goal - The Hoff comes on for.........Edwards with Keogh moving positions - why not just sub striker for striker?? Then Kightly comes on and replaces.........Jarvis with Keogh moving positions! I just wonder if Hennessey needs to come off will Keogh fill in as a keeper?
Again this is detracting a little from yesterdays fine performance and all the players deserve a pat on the back because everyone of them played extremely well! I&#039;m really pleased Keogh played well, and he did play well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Emerald Pete I don&#8217;t think anyone on this site is a Keogh boo boy, but yes there are some critics, and I happen to be one of them. Yesterday his performance was excellent and he created a goal and defended from the front. I have nothing to criticise him for based on yesterdays performance! Unfortunately on other occasions there have been reasons why he has been criticised, and as a &#8216;comment&#8217; based blog then everyone is entitled to their point of view &#8211; Keogh does not score enough goals full stop! His work rate and enthusiasm is second to none and I applaud him for that. Yesterday puzzled me a little, Keogh played well up front made a goal &#8211; Dave Edwards played really well and scored a goal &#8211; The Hoff comes on for&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Edwards with Keogh moving positions &#8211; why not just sub striker for striker?? Then Kightly comes on and replaces&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Jarvis with Keogh moving positions! I just wonder if Hennessey needs to come off will Keogh fill in as a keeper?<br />
Again this is detracting a little from yesterdays fine performance and all the players deserve a pat on the back because everyone of them played extremely well! I&#8217;m really pleased Keogh played well, and he did play well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EmeraldPete</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>EmeraldPete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Thomas, it&#039;s a fair point about backing in and if it was vidic &amp; Keogh, but dubious nothing, it was even a clear goal scoring chance and Mancienne did well to stay on the pitch because if he didn&#039;t drag his man down it was looking odds on 2-1 anyway.

Sam, I was pissed off we didn&#039;t get Hanson &amp; Dixon pouring over our performance with the post match analysis and praise our performance deserverd. As you rightly say Sam, we made a European team look ordinary.

Has anyone see the tabloids today? In particlar The Sun?

Keogh as the star man with the tag line of &quot;Movement in spades&quot; and Elokobi made there weekend prem dream team. Outstanding.

I notice the Keogh critics have decided not to show on the blog today.........MMMMM, interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, it&#8217;s a fair point about backing in and if it was vidic &amp; Keogh, but dubious nothing, it was even a clear goal scoring chance and Mancienne did well to stay on the pitch because if he didn&#8217;t drag his man down it was looking odds on 2-1 anyway.</p>
<p>Sam, I was pissed off we didn&#8217;t get Hanson &amp; Dixon pouring over our performance with the post match analysis and praise our performance deserverd. As you rightly say Sam, we made a European team look ordinary.</p>
<p>Has anyone see the tabloids today? In particlar The Sun?</p>
<p>Keogh as the star man with the tag line of &#8220;Movement in spades&#8221; and Elokobi made there weekend prem dream team. Outstanding.</p>
<p>I notice the Keogh critics have decided not to show on the blog today&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;MMMMM, interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dazza in Brisbane</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Dazza in Brisbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-990</guid>
		<description>sam.... i got live streaming at iraqgoals.net, however this kept breaking up/buffering and being generally frustrating. Pity I can&#039;t buffer the wife, and pause when she starts whingeing about me staying up to listen to the games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sam&#8230;. i got live streaming at iraqgoals.net, however this kept breaking up/buffering and being generally frustrating. Pity I can&#8217;t buffer the wife, and pause when she starts whingeing about me staying up to listen to the games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-989</guid>
		<description>all hail thomas the next derren brown!

what a great match yesterday was.  ok a bit nervy near the end but to start both halfs as we did, pressure the opposition and score some good goals and create good chances, i couldnt ask for much more.  kightly and seb back from injury, the hoff and castillio get home debuts and both doing well, defence shoring up.  the list of positievs go on.  yes it is only one match but at least we know we can do it, jsut got to keep the work rate up.

trying to follow the game online yesterday was horrible though.  no live streams, i got audio for about 10mins first half, and the last 25mins in the second.  the live updates on the bbc were mostly about the manchester derby.  i understand why but when they only put up info when we scored and when they got the penalty, that was pretty terrible.  also with only 4 games yesterday and all of them full of goals i expected a little more %share on match of the day and some analysis.  we dominated and made last years 7th place team look average.  our play made them poor until late into the 2nd.  stupid baggie charles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all hail thomas the next derren brown!</p>
<p>what a great match yesterday was.  ok a bit nervy near the end but to start both halfs as we did, pressure the opposition and score some good goals and create good chances, i couldnt ask for much more.  kightly and seb back from injury, the hoff and castillio get home debuts and both doing well, defence shoring up.  the list of positievs go on.  yes it is only one match but at least we know we can do it, jsut got to keep the work rate up.</p>
<p>trying to follow the game online yesterday was horrible though.  no live streams, i got audio for about 10mins first half, and the last 25mins in the second.  the live updates on the bbc were mostly about the manchester derby.  i understand why but when they only put up info when we scored and when they got the penalty, that was pretty terrible.  also with only 4 games yesterday and all of them full of goals i expected a little more %share on match of the day and some analysis.  we dominated and made last years 7th place team look average.  our play made them poor until late into the 2nd.  stupid baggie charles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-988</guid>
		<description>Pete, I only say it was dubious because Zamora had been backing into our defenders the whole game and I just thought the ref might have taken that into account.

Mancienne was a little silly in grappling with him when he had his back to goal, but for me, it&#039;s a little soft. Had that been Vidic wrestling with Keogh, there&#039;s no way we&#039;d get the decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, I only say it was dubious because Zamora had been backing into our defenders the whole game and I just thought the ref might have taken that into account.</p>
<p>Mancienne was a little silly in grappling with him when he had his back to goal, but for me, it&#8217;s a little soft. Had that been Vidic wrestling with Keogh, there&#8217;s no way we&#8217;d get the decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EmeraldPete</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/633/back-on-track-wolves-2-fulham-1/comment-page-1#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>EmeraldPete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=633#comment-987</guid>
		<description>Given the way the results went Saturday, Burnly and Birmingham winning, this really did need to be three points. Early in the season to be saying must win, but I think it was.

Thomas, in what way was that penalty even slightly dubious?????

Well done to the boys, I think Berra and Edwards in particular had strong outings. We will get a Man U reserver team hammering Wed, but couldn&#039;t care less. Use it as a training / rehabilatation session and give SEB and Kights a more competitive runout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the way the results went Saturday, Burnly and Birmingham winning, this really did need to be three points. Early in the season to be saying must win, but I think it was.</p>
<p>Thomas, in what way was that penalty even slightly dubious?????</p>
<p>Well done to the boys, I think Berra and Edwards in particular had strong outings. We will get a Man U reserver team hammering Wed, but couldn&#8217;t care less. Use it as a training / rehabilatation session and give SEB and Kights a more competitive runout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

