<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Record Signing Confirmed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolvesblog.com/53/record-signing-confirmed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/53/record-signing-confirmed</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/53/record-signing-confirmed/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=53#comment-17</guid>
		<description>@ Ben - I don&#039;t know much about Surman, but for a cheeky £1 million, he might end up being a snip. 

Wouldn&#039;t like to see Big Chris leave. We need him and I don&#039;t think he will be shipped out. More likely that  Vokes or Keogh will be loaned out and that&#039;s assuming Mick doesn&#039;t decide he needs them all, which he might well do.

Controversial about Mancienne. I think the bloke is quality and something different to what we already have. I&#039;d certainly take him if he&#039;s available, but he&#039;s not the finished article. The potential is there though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ben &#8211; I don&#8217;t know much about Surman, but for a cheeky £1 million, he might end up being a snip. </p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t like to see Big Chris leave. We need him and I don&#8217;t think he will be shipped out. More likely that  Vokes or Keogh will be loaned out and that&#8217;s assuming Mick doesn&#8217;t decide he needs them all, which he might well do.</p>
<p>Controversial about Mancienne. I think the bloke is quality and something different to what we already have. I&#8217;d certainly take him if he&#8217;s available, but he&#8217;s not the finished article. The potential is there though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/53/record-signing-confirmed/comment-page-1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=53#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Great signing. The sight of Sky Sports&#039; yellow scroll bar last night was a joy to behold. I almost shed a tear at their &#039;breaking news&#039; as I&#039;ve been imploring it to say something about the Wolves since we beat Doncaster!
That scroll bar told me one thing: We’ve arrived, and so the £6.5million seems almost secondary to the priceless feeling of showing some intent.
You could almost sense the excitement around the town today. Happy days.

As for Surman…Not seen much of him, but I am sure he has a good reputation for a reason. Maybe a more conservative alternative to Jarvis?
I’d like to know people’s thoughts on Big Chris. I bloody love him, and want him to stick around as I think he can have an impact. It would seem many rate Vokes above him, and even Keogh in some people’s eyes.
I can hear the worn out platitudes already…’Good old Chris, he’ll do a job for a Championship club’ etc etc.
Not a bit of it for me! I rate him and is the best big man down here since Dougan.
Maybe a thought for another time, as I am basking in this signing. Get in there!

PS, I could take or leave Mancienne. Not convinced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great signing. The sight of Sky Sports&#8217; yellow scroll bar last night was a joy to behold. I almost shed a tear at their &#8216;breaking news&#8217; as I&#8217;ve been imploring it to say something about the Wolves since we beat Doncaster!<br />
That scroll bar told me one thing: We’ve arrived, and so the £6.5million seems almost secondary to the priceless feeling of showing some intent.<br />
You could almost sense the excitement around the town today. Happy days.</p>
<p>As for Surman…Not seen much of him, but I am sure he has a good reputation for a reason. Maybe a more conservative alternative to Jarvis?<br />
I’d like to know people’s thoughts on Big Chris. I bloody love him, and want him to stick around as I think he can have an impact. It would seem many rate Vokes above him, and even Keogh in some people’s eyes.<br />
I can hear the worn out platitudes already…’Good old Chris, he’ll do a job for a Championship club’ etc etc.<br />
Not a bit of it for me! I rate him and is the best big man down here since Dougan.<br />
Maybe a thought for another time, as I am basking in this signing. Get in there!</p>
<p>PS, I could take or leave Mancienne. Not convinced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewwfc</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/53/record-signing-confirmed/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewwfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=53#comment-14</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very generous of you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very generous of you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/53/record-signing-confirmed/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=53#comment-13</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about the price Andrew. It was always going to be £6.5 million or nothing. However, I think that price is what put the likes of Everton and Villa off completing a deal, as they probably thought he was on the expensive side.

But for Wolves, we have to pay the money if we&#039;re going to get anyone of any real quality. 

I can see Surman signing for us, Mancienne is still unlikely and Huddlestone is a none-starter. If we sign all 3, I&#039;ll buy you a half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about the price Andrew. It was always going to be £6.5 million or nothing. However, I think that price is what put the likes of Everton and Villa off completing a deal, as they probably thought he was on the expensive side.</p>
<p>But for Wolves, we have to pay the money if we&#8217;re going to get anyone of any real quality. </p>
<p>I can see Surman signing for us, Mancienne is still unlikely and Huddlestone is a none-starter. If we sign all 3, I&#8217;ll buy you a half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewwfc</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/53/record-signing-confirmed/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewwfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=53#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Also, rumour on the grapevine (or the local Southampton paper as it&#039;s otherwise known) is that Surman was having a medical at a Premiership club yesterday (maybe Wolves?!!). Regarding my earlier comment; only Huddlestone and Mancienne to go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, rumour on the grapevine (or the local Southampton paper as it&#8217;s otherwise known) is that Surman was having a medical at a Premiership club yesterday (maybe Wolves?!!). Regarding my earlier comment; only Huddlestone and Mancienne to go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewwfc</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesblog.com/53/record-signing-confirmed/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewwfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesblog.com/?p=53#comment-11</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s difficult to judge whether Wolves have got a good deal here or not.  His buy-out clause was reportedly 6.5 million and Reading were never going to sell for less, so 6.5 million was always going to be the fee required.  Whilst he may only be worth, say 4 million, that is irrelevant as that figure was never going to be accepted.  If he scores 10+ goals and we stay up it will be a great bit of business!

I believe, however, this is a real statement of ambition by the Wolves board, and will hopefully help convince other potential signings to join as well.

Can&#039;t wait to see SEB and Doyle tearing Vidic and Ferdinand apart next season!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s difficult to judge whether Wolves have got a good deal here or not.  His buy-out clause was reportedly 6.5 million and Reading were never going to sell for less, so 6.5 million was always going to be the fee required.  Whilst he may only be worth, say 4 million, that is irrelevant as that figure was never going to be accepted.  If he scores 10+ goals and we stay up it will be a great bit of business!</p>
<p>I believe, however, this is a real statement of ambition by the Wolves board, and will hopefully help convince other potential signings to join as well.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see SEB and Doyle tearing Vidic and Ferdinand apart next season!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

